catholicteengroup

caleniel · by **caleniel** on Sun Aug 31, 2008 4:26 am

Ok... well. Chieftains of rural Celtic tribes are better though they might not be as rich or famous.

trip · by **trip** on Sun Aug 31, 2008 4:40 am

. . . Than what is there to make them better?

caleniel · by **caleniel** on Sun Aug 31, 2008 4:48 am

They were more talented. At throwing spears and such.

trip · by **trip** on Sun Aug 31, 2008 6:16 am

The fact that they themselves had to shows otherwise...

And how do you think one becomes king, anyway?

caleniel · by **caleniel** on Sun Aug 31, 2008 5:55 pm

One becomes king if one's daddy was king.

Talent on the other hand, is not merely inherited.

windrider · by **windrider** on Mon Sep 01, 2008 8:43 pm

Nope..like in my case. ;-)

jk

Erri · by **Erri** on Tue Sep 02, 2008 9:57 am

Back then though, Talent didn't come into it at all. You had to be good no matter what.

trip · by **trip** on Tue Sep 02, 2008 4:00 pm

One would become king if his father were the king, but that couldn't always have been the case, as God did not create kings; merely men who became them. So there would have to be one man who began every bloodline whose father was not a king. Whether by poll or talent, he became king.

windrider · by **windrider** on Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:14 pm

Oh..yeah that's true. aaand then..they would pass on the title....etc. ;-)

Erri · by **Erri** on Tue Sep 16, 2008 11:16 am

Hmmm, Well I could almost make it as a leader. I can throw a javlin... the fact i'd have to be within 10 feet of my enemy might not be to good, but i can throw it propably.

lol

windrider · by **windrider** on Sat Sep 20, 2008 12:03 am

Well, I KNOW I could be a leader..I can shoot a bow and arrow..and I can throw a javelin about...hmmm all of 2 feet!

catholicteengroup

etc

Who is online